Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42044354›Full record

Trial reportJMIR mental health2026

The Effectiveness and Mechanisms of Action of App-Based Interventions for Improving Mental Health and Workplace Well-Being: Randomized Controlled Trial.

Alexander MacLellan, Graeme Fairchild, Katherine S Button

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in JMIR mental health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Alexander MacLellanDepartment of Psychology, University of Bath, Claverton Down, Bath, England, BA2 7AY, United Kingdom, 44 01225 388388.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3927-3407
Graeme FairchildDepartment of Psychology, University of Bath, Claverton Down, Bath, England, BA2 7AY, United Kingdom, 44 01225 388388.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7814-9938
Katherine S ButtonDepartment of Psychology, University of Bath, Claverton Down, Bath, England, BA2 7AY, United Kingdom, 44 01225 388388.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4332-8789

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Depression is the most common mental health disorder worldwide and frequently leads to workplace absence. As face-to-face treatment can be difficult to access, app-based interventions are a popular solution, although their effectiveness in working populations and their mechanisms of action are unclear. Deficits in executive function may contribute to the onset and maintenance of depression, and executive function training is proposed to improve symptoms by enhancing executive function. Responders to cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) show improvements in executive function, suggesting that this may be one mechanism of action. Objective: This study investigated the effectiveness of app-based interventions (executive function or CBT-based) for reducing depressive and anxiety symptoms and improving workplace well-being, and assessed whether changes in executive function mediated improvements. Methods: A total of 228 participants (147 female participants) with mild-to-moderate symptoms of depression and anxiety were recruited online and randomly assigned to a waitlist control group, an executive function training group (NeuroNation app, Synaptikon GmbH), or a self-guided CBT group (Moodfit app, Roble Ridge LLC) for a 4-week intervention period. Participants assigned to the active intervention groups were asked to use their apps a minimum of 21 times during the intervention. Participants completed measures of depressive symptoms, anxiety symptoms, and workplace well-being, and a working memory task at baseline, postintervention, and follow-up (12 weeks). Results: Executive function training reduced anxiety (β=-2.79; P=.004) and depressive (β=-2.77; P=.02) symptoms at follow-up but not at postintervention, and it did not affect workplace well-being. There were no reductions in depressive or anxiety symptoms in the self-guided CBT group, though workplace well-being was improved at postintervention (β=3.72; P=.02) and follow-up (β=4.46; P=.02). Improvements in executive function did not mediate intervention-related changes in symptoms or workplace well-being. Self-reported adherence rates were high (executive function training: 48/54, 89%; self-guided CBT: 52/54, 96%), although attrition was high at follow-up (58% missing). Conclusions: These results suggest that app-based executive function training may be effective at managing symptoms of anxiety and depression in a working population, while self-guided CBT apps may improve workplace well-being. However, improving executive function did not appear to be a mechanism of action of either intervention.

Indexed as

AnxietyCognitive Behavioral TherapyDepressionExecutive FunctionMobile ApplicationsWorkplaceAdultCognitive TrainingFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPsychological Well-Beinganxietycognitive controlcomputerized cognitive trainingdepressiondigital mental health

Identifiers

PMID42044354
PMCPMC13119392

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.