ArticleJMIR aging2026
Smart Glasses for Older Adults With Cognitive Impairment: Explanatory Mixed Methods Study.
Article in JMIR aging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Smart glasses might present a promising solution to support older adults with cognitive impairment in maintaining independence. However, there exists a critical gap in smart glasses research that incorporates recently developed models or directly engages older adults with cognitive impairment. Objective: This study aimed to use survey and interview techniques to explore the acceptability and usability of smart glasses among older adults with cognitive impairment. Methods: This explanatory mixed methods descriptive study was conducted at an independent living older adult apartment building among residents with memory complaints or cognitive impairment. This study consisted of a quantitative survey (N=26), followed by smart glasses beta testing with qualitative interviews (n=14). Results: Overall, older participants with cognitive impairment conveyed a generally positive perception of smart glasses and their potential to support memory in daily life. Results suggest that participants prioritized the following smart glasses functions: audio reminders, phone calls, GPS, and distress signals, with audio reminders emerging as the highest-ranked feature. Additionally, participants emphasized the value of an intuitive and quick interface and a preference for audio, rather than visual, information exchange. Conclusions: This study supports the development and study of smart glasses for older adults with mild cognitive impairment. Smart glasses developers should place great importance on usability, such as intuitive command interfaces, and equip the smart glasses with functions that are relevant to this population, especially audio reminders. Additionally, future work should examine the integration of smart glasses over a longer period and among a larger sample of older adults with cognitive impairment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.