ArticleJMIR formative research2026
Comparing Perceptions of ChatGPT Use in Health Attitude Contexts Among Users and Nonusers: Cross-Sectional Study.
Article in JMIR formative research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: In light of the growing use of artificial intelligence (AI) in health care, individuals' access to and use of health information are transforming. ChatGPT, an AI chatbot, provides immediate responses to health queries, with the potential to influence health-related attitudes, thereby raising concerns related to privacy, reliability, and security. Objective: This study aimed to investigate the perceived usefulness, risks, anxiety, and social influence of ChatGPT on health attitudes among users and nonusers in Saudi Arabia. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted using an online survey based on a validated tool. In total, 337 participants aged 18 years and older responded to questions assessing their perceptions of ChatGPT on health-related attitudes. Results: Data showed that 76.1% (194/255) of the respondents used ChatGPT, with the majority being younger and more highly educated. The main uses for health-related purposes were health education (43/194, 22.2%) and physical activity guidance (31/194, 16%). The analysis showed that users considered ChatGPT useful for health-related decisions, with 45.9% (89/194) finding it easy to learn and use, but concerns about privacy (106/194, 54.7%) and reliability (87/194, 44.9%) remained. Among nonusers, security risks (39/61, 63.9%) were the major barrier to using AI-based tools for health purposes, and 68.9% (42/61) found such tools attractive and engaging. There were no statistically significant differences between users and nonusers across all examined sociodemographic characteristics (P>.05). Conclusions: The study established the potential of ChatGPT in improving health decision-making and revealed cultural, privacy, and trust issues that may affect its implementation. These findings underscore the importance of strengthening the security of AI-based applications to enhance public acceptability of related health policies and to support the safe integration of tools such as ChatGPT into the health care system.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.