ArticleRevista da Escola de Enfermagem da U S P2026
Manipulation and treatment of textiles and their relationship with healthcare-associated infections: a scoping review.
Article in Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da U S P, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Manipulation and treatment of textiles and their relationship with healthcare-associated infections: a scoping review.Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da U S P · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTextiles are essential and indispensable materials in healthcare, comprising a wide range of items such as patient clothing, staff uniforms, bed linen, curtains, and reusable sterile drapes. However, these materials can become vehicles for contamination, contribute to the spread of microorganisms, or even increase the rates of healthcare-associated infections (HCAIs).
objectiveTo map the available evidence in the scientific literature regarding the handling, processing, and contamination of textiles and the occurrence of HCAIs.
methodA scoping review was conducted following the JBI recommendations. The following databases were consulted: Web of Science, PubMed/Medline, CINAHL, LILACS, EMBASE, SCOPUS, and SCIELO. Grey literature was searched via the CAPES Theses and Dissertations Catalogue, MEDNAR, and Google Scholar. The duplicate removal, independent screening, data extraction, and synthesis were performed by two reviewers, and any discrepancies were resolved by a third evaluator. Observational or experimental studies, published in any language and without time restrictions were included. Data were presented through descriptive synthesis and tables containing relevant information.
resultsTwenty studies were included, with case series being the most common study design (14; 70%). The main theme involved outbreak investigations, with Bacillus cereus (7; 35,0%) emerging as the most significant microorganism contaminating textiles that come into contact with patients' skin. Contamination was linked to handling techniques, cleaning, processing, and storage practices. The use of copper oxide was suggested as a strategy in fabric production aimed at reducing contamination and HCAI rates.
conclusionControlling textile contamination requires an institutional commitment to active surveillance, quality hospital processes, and adherence to strict protocols, ensuring safe handling, processing, and storage, thereby reducing negative impacts on patient health and the effectiveness of the services provided.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.