ArticlePLOS mental health2026
Scoping review of mental health-related policies issued in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic in Peru.
Article in PLOS mental health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aims to identify, describe and analyze the policies enacted by the Peruvian health authorities to address the population mental health needs and adequate health services in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic. We conducted an scoping review of mental health-related policies published between 6 March 2020 (first case of COVID-19 in Peru) and 31 May 2023. The official websites of the Peruvian Government, the Social Security Health System (EsSalud), and the LILACS scientific database were used. Data was analyzed using content and thematic analysis. Eighty-two documents were included. Policies contents were divided into three main categories. First, the governance of mental health care, which portrays the principles guiding policies and those seeking to strengthen mental health services by increasing the allocation of budget, use technology to provide remote care, enhance infrastructure, equipment and materials, hiring and training staff, and assure biosafety measures. Second, service delivery of mental health care, including policies aimed to detect and provide specialized mental health care to different groups of the population. Third, some policies focused on community engagement, promotion, and prevention in mental health, such as reducing misinformation, promoting self-care, community participation, and working with local organizations. We found that Peru included most of the international recommendations, but some important weaknesses were found, such as the lack of indicators to assess their completion or procedures on how to adapt these policies to routine practices. Peru designed several policies to attend to the mental health of its population during the COVID-19 pandemic, specifically on the principles for the provision of mental health care, the strengthening of these services, detection of mental disorders, provision of mental health care, and care at the community level. This study will inform other countries on their design of mental health policies, especially those with a community model-of-care.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.