Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42044164›Full record

SynthesisPLoS biology2026

Bipedalism and brain expansion explain human handedness.

Thomas A Püschel, Rachel M Hurwitz, Chris Venditti

Abstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in PLoS biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Thomas A PüschelInstitute of Human Sciences, School of Anthropology and Museum Ethnography, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Rachel M HurwitzInstitute of Human Sciences, School of Anthropology and Museum Ethnography, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Chris VendittiSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Reading, Reading, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6776-2355

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Humans exhibit a striking and near-universal population-level right-hand preference, an evolutionary singularity unmatched among primates. Despite its pervasiveness, the origins of this lateralization remain poorly understood. Here, we combine phylogenetic comparative methods with meta-analysis to investigate manual lateralization across 41 anthropoid species (n = 2,025), testing longstanding eco-evolutionary hypotheses for handedness direction (mean handedness index, MHI) and strength (mean absolute handedness index, MABSHI). Our models reveal significant phylogenetic signal for both traits and identify Homo sapiens as an evolutionary outlier, exhibiting exceptional rightward bias and strength relative to phylogenetic expectations. However, this outlier status disappears when brain size (endocranial volume) and intermembral index are included, suggesting these factors are central to the emergence of human handedness. We also show that high MABSHI evolved early in hominin evolution, while MHI increased to unparalleled levels with the appearance of the genus Homo. Our findings identify bipedalism and neuroanatomical expansion as likely key drivers of uniquely human lateralization, while also revealing broader ecological patterns shaping handedness across primates. This work provides a framework for disentangling human-specific adaptations from general primate trends in the evolution of behavioral asymmetries.

Indexed as

BrainFunctional LateralityAnimalsBiological EvolutionHominidaeHumansPhylogenyPrimates

Identifiers

PMID42044164
PMCPMC13138751

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.