ArticlePLoS computational biology2026
STARCall integrates image stitching, alignment, and read calling to enable scalable analysis of in situ sequencing data.
Article in PLoS computational biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Fluorescent in situ sequencing involves imaging-based sequencing by synthesis in intact cells or tissues to reveal target nucleotide sequences inside each cell. Often, the target sequences are barcodes that indicate a perturbation (e.g., CRISPR guide or genetic variant) delivered to the cell. However, processing in situ sequencing data presents a considerable challenge, requiring stitching and aligning tens of thousands of images with millions of cells, detecting small amplicon colonies across sequencing cycles, and calling reads. To address these challenges, we introduce STARCall: STitching, Alignment and Read Calling for in situ sequencing, a software package that analyzes raw in situ sequencing images to produce a genotype-to-phenotype mapping for each cell. STARCall improves upon previous solutions by combining stitching and alignment of images into a single step that minimizes both inter-cycle and intra-cycle alignment error. STARCall also improves detection and extraction of sequencing reads, incorporating filters and normalization to combat background fluorophore signal. We compare STARCall to other methods using a diverse set of images that include commonly encountered imaging problems such as variable intensity across channels and cycles and high levels of background. Specifically, this comprises ~250,000 images from a pooled screen of ~3,500 barcoded LMNA variants expressed in U2OS cells and ~1,200 barcoded PTEN variants in induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSC) and iPSC-derived neurons. Overall, STARCall aligned more than 50% of tiles with <1 pixel residual misalignment on all nine image sets, outperforming alternative packages by 14-35%. STARCall also yielded an 8-40% increase in genotyped cells due to improved filtering and normalization methods that address background fluorescence. STARCall can call tools like CellPose to segment cells and CellProfiler to compute cell features from the phenotyping images. STARcall is open-source and freely available, providing a robust solution for the analysis of in situ sequencing data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.