Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42044132›Full record

Trial reportPloS one2026

Community health worker intervention to reduce worker exposure to volatile organic compounds in small business auto and beauty shops in a marginalized community: A cluster randomized controlled trial.

Shannon L Gutenkunst, Nathan Lothrop, Carolina Quijada, Marvin Chaires, Imelda Cortez, Flor Sandoval, Jella Balgos, Emma V Gallardo, Pedro Flores Gallardo, Sam Sneed and 12 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03455530 (Work Should Not Hurt You), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03455530 nacompletednot on this map

Work Should Not Hurt You: Reduction of Hazardous Exposures in Small Businesses Through a Community Health Worker Intervention

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of ArizonaRan2020 to 2024Enrolled268ConditionsCommunity Health Aides, Industrial Hygiene, Volatile Organic CompoundsArmsIndustrial Hygiene-Enhance Community Health Worker Intervention
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors.

Shannon L GutenkunstCenter for Biomedical Informatics and Biostatistics, Statistics Consulting Laboratory, The University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3505-3917
Nathan LothropMel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, The University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, United States of America.
Carolina QuijadaMel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, The University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, United States of America.
Marvin ChairesMel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, The University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, United States of America.
Imelda CortezSonora Environmental Research Institute, Incorporated, Tucson, Arizona, United States of America.
Flor SandovalSonora Environmental Research Institute, Incorporated, Tucson, Arizona, United States of America.
Jella BalgosSonora Environmental Research Institute, Incorporated, Tucson, Arizona, United States of America.
Emma V GallardoMel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, The University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, United States of America.
Pedro Flores GallardoMel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, The University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, United States of America.
Sam SneedMel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, The University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, United States of America.
Jenna K HonanMel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, The University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, United States of America.
Karla BaylessMel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, The University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, United States of America.
Xavier ChaidezMel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, The University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, United States of America.
Cristobal Reyes CuevasMel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, The University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, United States of America.
Jacqueline L LarsonMel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, The University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, United States of America.
Fernanda J CamargoMel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, The University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, United States of America.
Denise Moreno RamírezMel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, The University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, United States of America.
Maia IngramMel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, The University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, United States of America.
Scott CarvajalMel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, The University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, United States of America.
Dean BillheimerCenter for Biomedical Informatics and Biostatistics, Statistics Consulting Laboratory, The University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, United States of America.
Ann Marie WolfSonora Environmental Research Institute, Incorporated, Tucson, Arizona, United States of America.
Paloma I BeamerMel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, The University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, United States of America.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOccupational diseases affect many workers in the United States, with Latinos disproportionately affected. Small businesses face barriers to implementing workplace health protections that community health workers (CHWs) may help overcome. The objective of this study was to determine whether a CHW-led industrial hygiene intervention could reduce volatile organic compound (VOC) exposure in small auto repair and beauty shops that primarily employ marginalized workers.

methodsIn this two-arm, parallel, cluster randomized trial, small business (≤25 employees) auto repair and beauty shops in Tucson, AZ were randomized to immediate or delayed intervention, stratified by sector. CHWs assessed shops and provided knowledge of controls and $300 for new ones. Total VOCs (TVOCs) were measured using photoionization detectors placed on or near participants. The primary outcome was the change in TVOCs at the shop level after the intervention, assessed across three timepoints with four workshift measurements per assessment. Mixed-effects models accounted for clustering by shop.

resultsWe enrolled 38 auto repair shops and 46 beauty shops (73% Latino workers) and analyzed 846 workshift measurements at 236 shop assessments. Adjusted models showed a non-statistically significant intervention effect: auto shops experienced on average an estimated 28% TVOC increase (95% CI: -46% to 203%); beauty shops experienced on average an estimated 27% reduction (95% CI: -55% to 19%). Beauty shops had TVOC concentrations about 10 times higher than auto shops, and 87% of their assessments had ventilation rates below the recommended minimum.

conclusionsAlthough not statistically significant, the CHW-led intervention may meaningfully reduce VOC exposure in beauty shops. High TVOC concentrations and inadequate ventilation in beauty shops highlight the need for targeted interventions and policy changes to improve the air quality in these underserved small businesses.

trial registrationThis trial was registered with clinicaltrials.gov (NCT03455530) on March 6, 2018.

Indexed as

Community Health WorkersOccupational ExposureSmall BusinessVolatile Organic CompoundsAdultBeauty CultureFemaleHumansWorking ConditionsVolatile Organic Compounds

Identifiers

PMID42044132
PMCPMC13120284

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.