ArticlePLOS global public health2026
Women's postpartum family planning use and intention in Ethiopia: Disparities in the agrarian and pastoral contexts from a community-based cross-sectional study.
Article in PLOS global public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
28 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Despite the substantial improvement on maternal health service use and impactful intervention to reduce the risk of maternal and child deaths, uptake of Postpartum Family Planning (PPFP) has remain a critical gap in Ethiopia. There is a paucity of context-based evidence is crucial in addressing these gaps to inform policies. We assessed women's current use and intention on postpartum contraception in the agrarian and pastoral contexts of Ethiopia. A community-based house-to-house survey was conducted in ten selected Woredas from the agrarian and pastoral contexts of Ethiopia, for baseline assessment to design a community-based lifesaving package delivery model. Data were collected among randomly selected 3,097 women using structured web-based tool and analyzed using Stata/SE 18.0. A multi-level mixed-effect logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with women's current PPFP use and intention for future use in the agrarian and pastoral contexts. Only a quarter of women (25.3%, 95%CI:23.8%-26.9%) used PPFP with significant variations in agrarian (60.6%) and pastoral (0.9%) contexts. More than one-third (37.5%, 95%CI:35.8-39.2%) of women had the intention to use modern PPFP. Factors influenced both current and future PPFP use include women's antenatal care visits (AOR:3.46; 95%CI:2.25-5.32), strong social support (AOR:1.75; 95%CI:1.23-2.49), autonomy on FP use (AOR:3.25; 95%CI:1.89-5.59), and favorable attitude towards equitable gender norms (AOR:1.51; 95%CI:1.12-1.71). Nevertheless, women who had no access to health facilities (AOR:0.70; 95%CI:0.49-0.99), history of home birth (AOR:0.53; 95%CI:0.39-0.72), being from pastoral communities (AOR:0.03; 95%CI:0.01-0.06), and Muslim women (AOR:0.29; 95%CI:0.19-0.46) were less likely to current PPFP use and intention to use contraception. Women's current use and intention to modern PPFP was found to be low with significant disparities between agrarian and pastoralist communities. Improving antenatal care, social support, women's autonomy and transforming gender equitable-norms are crucial facilitators for PPFP use. Culturally-tailored interventions are required to promote women's autonomy to enhance use of PPFP.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.