ArticlePloS one2026
Enhancing microalgal productivity through bioactive substances, light, and CO2.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Microalgae play a crucial role in ecosystems, from oxygen production to sustaining food webs and offering valuable applications in industry and environmental management. Increasing their productivity in terms of biomass yield, cultivation time, and nutritional or metabolite quality remains a major challenge. This study assessed the effects of 10 bioactive substances (including lactones, phytohormones, and natural extracts), four light wavelengths, and four CO₂ injection regimes on Arthrospira platensis, Chlorella vulgaris, Ankistrodesmus falcatus, and Tetradesmus dimorphus, using linear modeling and LSD (Least Significant Difference) post hoc tests. N-butyryl-DL-homoserine lactone significantly enhanced A. platensis growth (94.4%), while naphthaleneacetic acid and indole-3-butyric acid promoted T. dimorphus growth (138.1% and 115.5%, respectively). More accessible alternatives, such as Aloe vera and coconut water, also stimulated growth: A. platensis, C. vulgaris, and A. falcatus increased by 85.3%, 69.2%, and 87.7% with Aloe vera, while T. dimorphus increased 80.5% with coconut water. Regarding light quality, red light (600-700 nm) benefited A. platensis and A. falcatus (49.2% and 20.8%, respectively), whereas blue light (400-490 nm) favored C. vulgaris and T. dimorphus (57.7% and 31.5%, respectively). CO₂ injection further enhanced biomass production and carbon fixation, particularly in C. vulgaris and A. falcatus (73.5% and 53.5%, respectively). However, combined treatments did not produce additive effects, suggesting complex interactions. Overall, these findings demonstrate the potential of bioactive substances and environmental conditions to improve microalgal performance and highlight the importance of investigating synergistic effects and scalability for large-scale production.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.