ArticleIEEE transactions on medical imaging2026
Improved Nondestructive Ultrasound Molecular Imaging With Lightweight Convolutional Neural Network.
Article in IEEE transactions on medical imaging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Ultrasound molecular imaging (USMI) is an imaging approach that utilizes targeted microbubbles (MBs) to highlight biomarkers of disease. While differential targeted enhancement (DTE) is the current state-of-the-art for USMI, its reliance on destructive pulses hinders real-time clinical application. We have developed a neural network-based nondestructive USMI, validated in vivo using a transgenic mouse model of spontaneous breast cancer. To enhance training efficacy despite a limited animal number (N=14), we utilized several augmentation strategies including the use of several targeted MB types for each animal to generate independent image and texture patterns, alternative DTE approaches (sham and injection DTE), and random patch selection, overall resulting in a total of 15,350 patches to train the network. The resulting nondestructive USMI produces an image of the pixelwise MB classification score of the presence of targeted MBs. Our nondestructive USMI achieved a correlation coefficient of 0.954 with DTE, a continuous dice coefficient of 0.863 for a molecular signal coverage of the lesion over 20%, and a higher AUC than DTE (0.954 vs. 0.845) compared to the reference image developed from the contrast enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) image and manual lesion contour. Nondestructive imaging during continuous motion of the transducer under elevation sweeps yielded fewer artifacts and higher AUC than DTE (0.953 vs. 0.892), compared to the reference image. This demonstrates the potential of free-hand and real-time nondestructive imaging. Overall, nondestructive imaging showed comparable performance to DTE under stationary conditions and superior performance to DTE under transducer motion, indicating its clinical imaging potential.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.