Trial reportCancer medicine2026
How to Better Manage Insomnia in French Cancer Patients With a Guided Internet-Based Cognitive Behavioral Therapy? The Sleep-4-All 2.0 Real World Multicenter Single-Arm Interventional Study.
Trial report in Cancer medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionInternet-Based Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Insomnia (ICBT-I) can be leveraged to facilitate access to CBT in oncology. Nevertheless, adherence to self-guided ICBT remains low (50%-60%). The Sleep-4-All-2.0 study combined an ICBT-I (Insomnet) with phone-based guidance provided by a CBT psychologist. This study assessed: (1) the performance of this combined approach in terms of adherence and insomnia remission rates, and (2) patients' characteristics associated with better or poorer outcomes.
methodsThis real-world multicenter single-arm interventional study included patients with any tumor type and with an Insomnia Severity Index (ISI) score ≥ 8. Online questionnaires were used to compare adherence, insomnia remission, and sleep perception at weeks (W) 6, 12, and 24 post-intervention. Descriptive and multivariate analyses were performed.
resultsAmong 348 consenting patients, 310 (89%) initiated Insomnet and completed baseline assessment (W0). Questionnaire completion rates among initiators were 85% (263/310) at W6, 71% (219/310) at W12, and 53% (164/310) at W24. Program adherence (≥ 5/6 modules completed by W12) was 74% (230/310). Insomnia remission rates were 34%, 46%, and 50%, and insomnia was no longer a problem for 48%, 63%, and 66% in W6, 12, and 24, respectively. Unemployed patients at baseline were more likely to show a decrease in ISI scores. Patients taking a sleep medication, with high sleepiness and fatigue scores at baseline and with fewer digital skills, seem to benefit less from the intervention.
conclusionICBT-I with phone-based guidance showed satisfactory rates of adherence and insomnia remission. Implementing the program effectively requires considering patients' profiles.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.