Article in Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
2 · The registry
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
5 · Who and what money
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Junge YangInstitute of Technology for Carbon Neutrality. Shenzhen Key Laboratory of Energy Materials for Carbon Neutrality, Shenzhen Institute of Advanced Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenzhen, China.
Zhengjie ChenFaculty of Materials Science and Energy Engineering, Shenzhen University of Advanced Technology, Shenzhen, China.
Lili ZhangInstitute of Technology for Carbon Neutrality. Shenzhen Key Laboratory of Energy Materials for Carbon Neutrality, Shenzhen Institute of Advanced Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenzhen, China.
Tao ZhangInstitute of Technology for Carbon Neutrality. Shenzhen Key Laboratory of Energy Materials for Carbon Neutrality, Shenzhen Institute of Advanced Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenzhen, China.
Shida BaoFaculty of Materials Science and Energy Engineering, Shenzhen University of Advanced Technology, Shenzhen, China.
Jing PengInstitute of Technology for Carbon Neutrality. Shenzhen Key Laboratory of Energy Materials for Carbon Neutrality, Shenzhen Institute of Advanced Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenzhen, China.
Hui-Ming ChengInstitute of Technology for Carbon Neutrality. Shenzhen Key Laboratory of Energy Materials for Carbon Neutrality, Shenzhen Institute of Advanced Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenzhen, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5387-4241
Funding
Guang Dong Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation 2023B1515020102Guang Dong Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation 2025A1515010831National Key Research and Development Program of China 2022YFB3803400National Natural Science Foundation of China 22275205National Natural Science Foundation of China 52403381Shenzhen Science and Technology Program JCYJ20230807140900001Shenzhen Science and Technology Program KCXFZ20240903094203005
6 · The paper itself
Abstract
The electrooxidation of 5-hydroxymethylfurfural (HMF) to 2,5-furandicarboxylic acid (FDCA) has attracted great attention in biomass value-added conversion. However, the central challenge for achieving industrial-level scalable biomass upgrading is that the catalysts' inherent preference for activating O─H bond in the competitive oxygen evolution reaction (OER) over the strong C─H bond in organic molecules. Herein, we designed a Cu-substituted Ni(OH)
Indexed as
biomass upgradingcompetitive reactionHMF electrooxidationindustrial current densityorthogonal activity
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.
Orthogonal Design of Competing Deprotonation Process in Cation-Mediated Ni(OH) · full record | OpenQuestion