ArticleEndocrine2026
Assessing Patient Characteristics in Neuroendocrine Tumor Research: A Comparison of the NET-PRO Study to SEER Population-Based Data.
Article in Endocrine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05064150 (A Cohort Study of Symptom Burden and Therapeutic Selection in Neuroendocrine Tumors), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Cohort Study of Symptom Burden and Therapeutic Selection in Neuroendocrine Tumors (NETs)
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
32 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeWe compared demographic and clinical characteristics of patients with gastroenteropancreatic (GEP) and lung neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) enrolled in the NET-PRO study to those in the U.S. Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) program to evaluate the comparability of NET-PRO as a resource for real-world evidence generation and patient reported outcomes (PROs).
methodsNET-PRO enrolled adults with GEP or lung NETs from 14 health systems between 2018 and 2024. SEER data included patients diagnosed with NETs from 2018 to 2021 across 22 U.S. cancer registries. We compared age, sex, race/ethnicity, tumor site, stage, and surgery between cohorts using standardized mean differences (SMDs), with values ≥ 0.2 interpreted as meaningful.
resultsWe analyzed 1,974 GEP-NET and 394 lung NET patients in NET-PRO versus 38,942 and 11,265, respectively, in SEER. Most demographic and clinical characteristics were broadly similar between cohorts, with trivial differences by sex (SMDs 0.16–0.22) and moderate differences in mean age (SMD = 0.47 for lung NETs). Race/ethnicity differences were larger, with Non-Hispanic White patients overrepresented in NET-PRO (SMDs 0.53–0.84). Tumor site and stage distributions differed modestly. Surgery rates were comparable for GEP-NETs but higher among NET-PRO lung NET patients (SMD = 0.47).
conclusionNET-PRO demonstrates broadly comparable demographic characteristics to SEER across factors such as age and sex. While race/ethnicity differences highlight areas for improved inclusion, other areas of variation suggest important future research covariates. These findings support the contextual comparability of NET-PRO with the broader NET population and its value as a resource for real-world evidence generation. NCT NUMBER: NCT05064150 (Start Date: 2022-05-10).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.