Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42043699›Full record

SynthesisEating and weight disorders : EWD2026

A systematic review of psychometric scales that assess familial, lifestyle, and behavioural factors for children living with overweight or obesity, or at risk of developing obesity.

Bríd Áine Davis, Claire O'Dwyer, Alan Carr, Kathy Looney

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Eating and weight disorders : EWD, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Bríd Áine DavisSchool of Psychology, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4606-4432
Claire O'DwyerSchool of Psychology, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7978-9731
Alan CarrSchool of Psychology, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4563-8852
Kathy LooneySchool of Psychology, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland. kathy.looney@ucd.ie.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0815-2012

Funding

Health Service Executive D Psych Sc
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Over the past four decades, global childhood obesity rates have risen significantly. Modifiable factors such as diet, physical activity, family dynamics, and screen time play an important role in childhood obesity and are often targeted in interventions. However, no comprehensive review of instruments assessing these factors has been published, prompting this study. A systematic review following PRISMA guidelines was conducted to identify validated multidimensional lifestyle assessment instruments (defined as those assessing at least two constructs) for children aged 2-12 years living with overweight or obesity. Four databases (Pubmed, PsychINFO, CINAHL, and Embase) were searched for studies from 1980 to 2024. First, 7844 studies were screened by title and abstract by two independent reviewers. The resultant 141 full-text studies were also independently reviewed by 2 reviewers. Study quality was assessed and data on psychometric properties were extracted. Thirteen papers covering eight instruments were included: Healthy Kids (Niños Sanos), Family Health Behaviour Scale, Lifestyle Behaviour Checklist, Family Nutrition Physical Activity screening tool, Family Eating and Activity Habits Questionnaire, Home Environment Survey, Child Obesity Risk Questionnaire 2-5, and Energy Retention Behaviour Scale for Children. These instruments assessed various factors, including diet, mealtime routines, physical activity, sedentary behaviour, sleep, parental beliefs and the home environment. The instruments showed significant heterogeneity, with no single instrument covering the entire 2-12 years age range or measuring the same constructs comprehensively. The quality of the reviewed studies varied, particularly in the range of psychometric properties examined. Based on the results of this review, there is no one measure shown to be validated specifically for children living with overweight/obesity that addresses a broad range of domains that respond to change over time.Level II: Evidence obtained from well-designed controlled trials without randomisation.

Indexed as

OverweightPsychometricsChildChild, PreschoolExerciseFamilyHealth BehaviorHumansLife StylePediatric ObesityRisk FactorsChildhood obesityhealth-related quality of life (HRQOL)lifestyle measures

Identifiers

PMID42043699
PMCPMC13253707

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.