Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42043665›Full record

ReviewBiogerontology2026

Investigating fasting for metabolic health and longevity.

Matthew L Steinhauser, Pouneh K Fazeli

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Biogerontology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Matthew L SteinhauserCenter for Human Integrative Physiology, Aging Institute, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, USA. msteinhauser@pitt.edu.
Pouneh K FazeliCenter for Human Integrative Physiology, Aging Institute, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, USA. pkfazeli@pitt.edu.

Funding

NIH/NIDDK DK133578NIH/NIDDK R01 DK133578 and R01 DK137913
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Humans have evolved adaptive mechanisms that enable survival even with zero calories for periods of months or longer. Intermittent 'low-dose' exposure to the metabolic stress of fasting may also activate pathways that promote metabolic health and longevity, although such benefits have not been proven in humans. Here we present our perspective of the current rationale and evidence base to support fasting for gain in metabolic health. In the absence of individual level risk factors for potential harm, such as frailty, osteoporosis or osteopenia, or a current/historical eating disorder, a trial of intermittent fasting or time-restricted eating to promote weight loss and metabolic health is reasonable for the motivated patient who is overweight or obese. We conclude, however, that the current state of evidence is limited and not sufficient to justify widespread adoption of fasting practices, nor is it sufficient to exclude the possibility that fasting holds a key to a longer life. We provide a template for the types of studies that will be required to optimize fasting protocols and establish therapeutic proof of concept. In our opinion, incorporation of mechanistic and multi-omics endpoints will be critical to understand potential mechanisms of benefit in humans; pathways that could ultimately be targeted with a fasting mimetic drug to obviate the need for long-term adherence to onerous dietary restriction.

Indexed as

FastingLongevityAnimalsCaloric RestrictionHumansIntermittent FastingCaloric restrictionFastingLongevityObesityStarvationTime restricted eating

Identifiers

PMID42043665

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.