ArticlePediatric surgery international2026
Assessment of intra-operative bowel perfusion in children using indocyanine green: an exploratory study investigating its effect on surgical management.
Article in Pediatric surgery international, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIntra-operative bowel perfusion assessment using indocyanine green (ICG) is an emerging technology that may improve outcomes in paediatric surgery. We aimed to investigate whether intra-operative perfusion assessment using ICG would change a surgeon's management plan in children undergoing elective stoma closure.
methodsFour operative videos (two ileostomy and two colostomy closures) showing proximal and distal limbs of bowel immediately prior to anastomosis were independently assessed by paediatric surgeons. Prior to the intravenous injection of ICG, surgeons were asked if perfusion in each stoma limb was 'adequate' or 'poor', and whether they would complete an anastomosis. After injection of ICG, the same questions were repeated. Primary outcome was the proportion of surgeons who changed their plan after witnessing ICG administration.
resultsIn all four stoma closures there were no operative complications and no adverse events related to ICG injection. Twenty-four surgeons participated in the study, resulting in 96 assessments. Twelve (50%) surgeons changed their management plan at least once after witnessing ICG administration. Nineteen surgeons (79%) considered ICG to be useful in this context. Surgeons stated ICG perfusion assessment was useful to confirm their visual assessment of bowel perfusion. Participants highlighted the lack of data linking intra-operative bowel perfusion assessment with ICG to surgical outcomes in children.
conclusionsAssessment of intra-operative bowel perfusion using ICG resulted in 50% of surgeons changing their management plan. The majority of surgeons believed that ICG was useful in this context. However, the relationship between ICG perfusion and clinical outcomes remains unknown.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.