ArticleAnnals of hematology2026
Differential impact of allogeneic stem-cell transplantation on large B-cell lymphomas and peripheral T-cell lymphomas.
Article in Annals of hematology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Allogeneic hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) is one of the standard treatments for relapsed/refractory (r/r) non-Hodgkin lymphoma, but benefits across large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL) and nodal peripheral T-cell lymphoma (PTCL) subtypes remain unclear. This single-center retrospective study evaluated outcomes after the first allo-HSCT in 92 adults with r/r aggressive lymphoma (59 and 33 patients with LBCLs and PTCLs, respectively) treated during 2011–2023. The patients’ median age was 51 years; 58.7% had active disease at transplant, and 77.2% received cord blood grafts. With a median follow-up of 7.6 years among survivors, the 5-year overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) rates were 31.6% and 27.9%, respectively. Furthermore, the non-relapse mortality (NRM) and relapse/progression rates were 30.8% and 41.3%, respectively. Compared with patients with LBCLs, those with PTCLs showed superior 5-year outcomes (OS: 47.7% vs. 22.4%, P = 0.03; PFS: 39.7% vs. 21.0%, P = 0.04) and lower relapse rates (26.9% vs. 49.5%, P = 0.02), with similar NRM and acute graft-versus-host disease rates. Multivariable models showed that PTCL histology was an independent predictor of improved OS and PFS. These findings suggest that allo-HSCT confers greater long-term benefits in patients with PTCL, supporting its role as an effective option in this subgroup.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.