SynthesisAnnals of hematology2026
Real-world incidence of severe infections in multiple myeloma patients receiving bispecific antibodies: a meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Annals of hematology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Bispecific antibodies (BiTEs) have transformed the therapeutic landscape of relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM), offering deep and durable responses even in heavily pretreated patients. However, their use carries substantial infectious risk due to immunosuppression, particularly hypogammaglobulinemia, induced by T-cell-redirecting therapy. To define the real-world incidence of grade 3–4 infections, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of retrospective studies including RRMM patients treated with BiTEs currently approved for clinical use. Ten studies encompassing 1,373 patients were analysed using a random-effects model of pooled proportions. The overall rate of grade 3–4 infections was 0.25 (95% CI, 0.22–0.30) after a median follow-up of 8.3 months, with moderate heterogeneity (I²=52.9%). Subgroup analyses showed comparable pooled event rates for teclistamab—anti-CD3/BCMA—(0.26; 95% CI, 0.22–0.31) and talquetamab—anti-CD3/GPRC5D—(0.23; 95% CI, 0.14–0.33). Meta-regression revealed an inverse association between infection rates and mean number of prior therapy lines (p = 0.002) and prior BCMA exposure (p = 0.0019), likely because, in real world setting, clinicians select fitter, immunologically stable patients for BiTEs therapy. In summary, approximately one in four RRMM patients receiving BiTEs experiences severe infection. These findings underscore the need for proactive monitoring and standardized preventive measures, including immunoglobulin replacement, prophylaxis, vaccination, to ensure safe, effective integration of BiTEs into routine MM care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.