ArticleExperimental brain research2026
Bidirectional modulation of soleus spinal excitability induced by upper limb movement practice.
Article in Experimental brain research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Interlimb neural coupling allows upper limb (UL) activity to influence lower limb (LL) spinal excitability, yet the direction and magnitude of this modulation can vary across individuals. While rhythmic, locomotor-like UL tasks typically suppress soleus H-reflex amplitude, the effects of discrete voluntary UL movements remain unclear. The objective of this study was to determine whether rhythmic UL movements modulate soleus H-reflex excitability. Twenty-four able-bodied adults completed a single session including a 20-min paradigm of four symmetric, bilateral UL movements performed at 1 Hz. Soleus H-reflexes were measured using peripheral nerve stimulation while participants stood upright (two baselines and post UL task). Hmax/Mmax ratios were compared across time points, and k-means clustering was applied to individual change scores to identify responder subgroups. No significant group-level modulation of H-reflex excitability was observed following UL movement practice (p = 0.564). However, clustering revealed two distinct and opposite response profiles. One subgroup (n = 13) demonstrated a significant decrease in H-reflex excitability (22.1% ± 11.0% suppression), while the other subgroup (n = 11) exhibited a significant increase (19.5% ± 12.5% facilitation). Fatigue ratings increased post-intervention, whereas energy ratings remained stable. UL movements can modulate spinal excitability bidirectionally, with individuals showing either facilitation or suppression of the soleus H-reflex. This individualized responsiveness highlights heterogeneity in interlimb neural coupling, suggesting that UL-based neuromodulation strategies may require personalized tailoring. The classification of facilitatory and suppressive responders offers a methodological framework for developing adaptive rehabilitation approaches that leverage natural interlimb circuit interactions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.