Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42043576›Full record

ArticleCurrent microbiology2026

Network Analysis of Wheat and Couchgrass Rhizobacteria Highlights Candidate Biocontrol Agents for Improved Crop Resilience.

Nataliya Pronovich, Darya Tarasova, Gulnaz Galieva, Polina Galitskaya, Svetlana Selivanovskaya, Polina Kuryntseva

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Current microbiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Nataliya PronovichInstitute of Ecology, Biotechnology and Nature Management, Kazan (Volga region) Federal University, Kazan, 420008, Russia. pronovich.natascha@yandex.ru.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0007-3630-0055
Darya TarasovaInstitute of Ecology, Biotechnology and Nature Management, Kazan (Volga region) Federal University, Kazan, 420008, Russia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0006-7699-7494
Gulnaz GalievaInstitute of Ecology, Biotechnology and Nature Management, Kazan (Volga region) Federal University, Kazan, 420008, Russia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4325-3924
Polina GalitskayaInstitute of Ecology, Biotechnology and Nature Management, Kazan (Volga region) Federal University, Kazan, 420008, Russia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5070-786X
Svetlana SelivanovskayaInstitute of Ecology, Biotechnology and Nature Management, Kazan (Volga region) Federal University, Kazan, 420008, Russia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6379-7166
Polina KuryntsevaInstitute of Ecology, Biotechnology and Nature Management, Kazan (Volga region) Federal University, Kazan, 420008, Russia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9274-7077

Funding

The Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation FZSM-2026-0029
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

One promising approach for enhancing soil fertility and improving agricultural productivity involves the use of rhizospheric bacteria as biocontrol agents. In this study, the rhizobiomes of wheat (species Triticum aestivum) and couchgrass (species Elytrigia repens) were analyzed to identify hub taxa with potential biocontrol properties. A comparative analysis of diversity, community composition, and bacterial interaction networks in the rhizosphere was conducted based on 16S rRNA gene sequencing. The bacterial rhizobiome of wheat exhibited great diversity; however, interaction networks within the couchgrass rhizosphere were more complex and interconnected. Network analysis identified hub taxa that may be associated with the structural organization of rhizosphere microbial communities. This study lays the groundwork for further investigation into the use of hub taxa as biocontrol agents. Future research should focus on biotechnological validation of their properties, as the integration of their roles within microbial communities and their potential beneficial effects may contribute to mitigating the impact of abiotic stresses on wheat.

Indexed as

BacteriaBiological Control AgentsPoaceaeTriticumRhizomeRhizosphereRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSoil MicrobiologyBiological Control AgentsRNA, Ribosomal, 16S

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.