ArticleEuropean journal of pediatrics2026
Focus on comfort: the effect of focus language on postoperative hospital stay compared to the Numeric Rating Scale in children receiving postoperative care-a pre-post study.
Article in European journal of pediatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study evaluates the effect of a comfort assessment using focus language compared with pain assessment using the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) on postoperative length of stay (LOS), analgesic use and patient and parental satisfaction. Prospective pre-post study was conducted on a general pediatric ward. During the pre-intervention period, pain was assessed using the NRS. Post-intervention, comfort was assessed by focus language using comfort scores; an approach that shifts the conversation from the reduction of pain to the improvement of comfort. Eligible participants were children ≥ 6 years receiving postoperative care for > 24 h, able to report a NRS. Primary outcome was LOS (hours). Secondary outcomes were analgesic use (hours) and patient and parental satisfaction. Multivariable linear regression was used to adjust for baseline differences, potential confounding and effect modification. Pre-intervention 93 patients were included and post-intervention 99. The adjusted mean LOS in the post-intervention group: 94 h, was higher than in the pre-intervention group: 74 h (p < 0.01). The estimated LOS was significantly higher post-intervention, suggesting more complex surgeries during that period; no statistically significant difference was found between estimated and actual LOS. Analgesic use and patient and parental satisfaction were comparable.
conclusionA focus on comfort during pediatric postoperative care did not statistically significantly impact the LOS, the analgesic use, and patients and parents' satisfaction. Shifting from pain-focused to comfort-focused communication appears to be a safe, feasible, and promising approach. Future research requires more homogeneous patient groups to determine the impact of using comfort-focused language. WHAT IS KNOWN: • The NRS is commonly used to assess pain in children ≥ 6 years. • Pain-related communication may influence the perception of pain. WHAT IS NEW: • Comfort assessment instead of NRS did not change analgesic use or patient/parent satisfaction. • Comfort-focused communication appears safe and feasible in pediatric postoperative care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.