ReviewImmunogenetics2026
The digital keystone: how artificial intelligence is reshaping HLA research and clinical practice.
Review in Immunogenetics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Causal AI for cancer immunotherapy: a narrative framework review of target trial emulation, treatment-effect learning and clinical translation.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The human leukocyte antigen (HLA) system underpins allorecognition and shapes the response to infection, autoimmunity, and treatment response. Technological advances from serology to next-generation sequencing now enable full-gene characterization and four-field HLA nomenclature, while artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning are transforming the data generation, interpretation, and clinical use. This review summarizes the progress on the technical developments in the HLA era, which could be evaluated in three perspectives. First, we survey AI for antigen processing and T-cell recognition, including HLA–peptide binding, presentation, and T cell receptor (TCR)–epitope models, and outline their effects on applications like neoantigen discovery, vaccine design, and tolerance induction. Since there are still persistent gaps in immunogenicity prediction and coverage of rare alleles, secondly, we evaluated HLA imputation from the single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) arrays and low-coverage whole-genome sequencing, highlighting deep learning models that improve accuracy for common and low-frequency alleles, and the critical role of diverse reference panels. Third, we assessed the AI-enabled transplant decision support: survival and graft-versus-host disease forecasting from registry data, donor ranking beyond simple allele match, and crossmatch compatibility prediction. We integrate emerging biology, non-classical HLA molecules, allele-specific expression, and HLA loss of heterozygosity, as key modulators of immune activation and evasion with implications for donor selection, infectious diseases, vaccinology, inflammatory disease, and cancer therapy. To accelerate safe clinical translation, we need to have standards for data governance, fairness auditing, validation and calibration, explainability, robustness, monitoring, and human oversight. By bridging core HLA principles with recent biological insights and AI innovations, we outline a path toward reproducible and equitable clinical translation to immunogenomics in transplantation, infectious, inflammatory, oncologic diseases, and precision vaccinology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.