Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42043555›Full record

ReviewIntensive care medicine2026

Non-invasive intracranial pressure estimation in the intensive care unit: narrative review of methods and clinical applications.

Edoardo Picetti, Daniele Guerino Biasucci, Elisa Gouvea Bogossian, Sérgio Brasil, Danilo Cardim, Marek Czosnyka, Daniel A Godoy, Gregory W J Hawryluk, Mohammad I Hirzallah, Frank A Rasulo and 4 more

Erratum issuedAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Intensive care medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Edoardo PicettiDepartment of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Parma University Hospital, Parma, Italy.
Daniele Guerino BiasucciDepartment of Clinical Science and Translational Medicine, "Tor Vergata" University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Elisa Gouvea BogossianDepartment of Intensive Care, Erasme Hospital, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.
Sérgio BrasilDivision of Neurosurgery, Department of Neurology, School of Medicine, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Danilo CardimDepartment of Neurology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, USA.
Marek CzosnykaDepartment of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Daniel A GodoyNeuroscience Institute, Universidad El Bosque, Bogota, Colombia.
Gregory W J HawrylukCleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine of Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, USA.
Mohammad I HirzallahDepartment of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, USA.
Frank A RasuloDepartment of Medical and Surgical Specialties, Radiological Sciences and Public Health, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy.
Carla Bittencourt RynkowskiDepartment of Emergency and Trauma, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade Federal de Ciências da Saúde de Porto Alegre, Porto Alegre, Brazil.
Andres M RubianoNeuroscience Institute, Universidad El Bosque, Bogota, Colombia.
Fabio Silvio TacconeDepartment of Intensive Care, Erasme Hospital, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.
Chiara RobbaIRCCS, Policlínico San Martino, Genoa, Italy. kiarobba@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1628-3845

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite invasive methods are the gold standard for intracranial pressure (ICP) measurement, several non-invasive techniques (nICP) have been proposed as surrogate, although their use remains insufficiently recognized in clinical practice. These include transcranial Doppler blood flow velocity  assessment (arterial or venous), optic nerve sheath diameter (ONSD), automated pupillometry, measurement of skull expansion and compliance, brain imaging, double-depth ophthalmic artery blood flow velocity, and ultrasound time-of-flight. The main limitations of all indirect methods are calibration and zeroing, which constrain the absolute accuracy of non-invasive ICP monitoring. For transcranial Doppler-based methods, the 95% limits of agreement are approximately ± 7-15 mmHg, while for ONSD-based techniques they range from ± 7-10 mmHg. Improved predictive accuracy may be achieved by combining different modalities and applying advanced signal analysis techniques. Importantly, in patients with acute brain injury, nICP can complement invasive monitoring by guiding patient selection for urgent monitoring, facilitating brain assessment in moderate traumatic brain injury, and assisting management in patients with coagulopathy. In the general intensive care population, nICP may provide valuable information after cardiac arrest, liver failure, and sepsis. In the emergency department, early detection of intracranial hypertension helps prevent missing the "golden hour" of brain care. Finally, nICP is particularly relevant in low-resource settings, where intensive care facilities are limited.

Indexed as

Intracranial PressureBlood Flow VelocityCritical CareHumansIntensive Care UnitsIntracranial HypertensionMonitoring, PhysiologicOptic NerveUltrasonography, Doppler, TranscranialAutomated pupillometryBrain ultrasoundIntensive care medicineNon-invasive intracranial pressureOutcomeSecondary brain damage

Identifiers

PMID42043555
PMCPMC13221341

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.