Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42043478›Full record

Observational studyEuropean journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society2026

Operative burden and resuscitation resource utilisation in patients with traumatic shock requiring urgent surgical or endovascular intervention.

Michael Noonan, Michael O'Loan, Simon Hendel, Mark Fitzgerald, Ee-Jun Ban, Frederick Huynh, Siobhan McKay, Adam Scorer, Gerard S Goh, Charles H C Pilgrim

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Michael NoonanNational Trauma Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia. michael.noonan@monash.edu.
Michael O'LoanNational Trauma Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia.
Simon HendelNational Trauma Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia.
Mark FitzgeraldNational Trauma Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia.
Ee-Jun BanNational Trauma Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia.
Frederick HuynhNational Trauma Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia.
Siobhan McKayHepatobiliary Surgery Unit, The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Australia.
Adam ScorerNational Trauma Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia.
Gerard S GohSchool of Translational Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
Charles H C PilgrimNational Trauma Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatients with traumatic shock represent a high-risk subgroup within major trauma populations, yet the operative burden and resuscitation resource utilisation associated with urgent surgical and endovascular intervention in trauma systems managing predominantly blunt injury remain incompletely described.

aimsTo describe the epidemiology, resuscitation resource utilisation, and operative burden of patients presenting with traumatic shock who require urgent surgical or endovascular intervention.

methodsWe conducted a retrospective observational study at an Australian level 1 trauma centre using prospectively maintained trauma registries. Adult major trauma patients (≥ 16 years, Injury Severity Score ≥ 13) meeting institutional shocked trauma activation criteria between December 2022 and December 2024 were included. Resource utilisation, blood product transfusion, operative and endovascular interventions, procedural timing, and critical care outcomes were described. Comparisons were performed between shocked patients requiring urgent surgical or endovascular intervention and those managed without urgent procedures.

resultsOf 3667 major trauma patients, 324 (8.8%) met shocked trauma criteria, and 138 (42.6% of shocked patients) underwent urgent surgical or endovascular intervention. These patients demonstrated substantial operative complexity; 37.7% required combined multispecialty interventions with 74.6% undergoing two or more operations within the first seven days. Median time to index urgent intervention was 150 min, and two-thirds of urgent surgical procedures occurred out-of-hours. ICU admission was near universal (94.9%) among patients requiring urgent intervention, with longer ICU LOS (median 8.0 days). Although median transfusion volumes were modest, marked heterogeneity in blood product utilisation was observed. High-volume transfusion (≥ 10 units PRBC within 24 h) occurred more frequently among patients requiring urgent intervention compared with those managed without urgent procedures (25.4% vs. 8.1%, p < 0.001).

conclusionsIn a trauma system where blunt polytrauma predominates, patients with traumatic shock requiring urgent surgical or endovascular intervention represent a small but disproportionately resource-intensive cohort. Care is frequently iterative, multispecialty, and delivered out-of-hours, with substantial transfusion and critical care requirements. These findings highlight the need for sustained 24/7 trauma system capability and may inform future strategies for early risk stratification and resource planning in Australian trauma centres.

Indexed as

Endovascular ProceduresResuscitationShock, TraumaticAdultAustraliaBlood TransfusionFemaleHealth ResourcesHumansInjury Severity ScoreMaleMiddle AgedRegistriesRetrospective StudiesTrauma CentersWounds, NonpenetratingBleedingInjuryMassive transfusionShockSurgeryTrauma

Identifiers

PMID42043478
PMCPMC13121394

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.