Article in Tropical animal health and production, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
2 · The registry
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
5 · Who and what money
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Cintia R R Queiroz-MachadoCentro Universitario Regional Noroeste (CENUR), Universidad de la República, Tacuarembó, Uruguay. cintiaregina.q@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9086-3867
Caroline da Silva SilveiraPlataforma de Investigación en Salud Animal (PSA), Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria (INIA), Estación Experimental La Estanzuela, Colonia, Uruguay.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0957-7773
Federico GiannittiPlataforma de Investigación en Salud Animal (PSA), Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria (INIA), Estación Experimental La Estanzuela, Colonia, Uruguay.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8799-6848
Martín FragaPlataforma de Investigación en Salud Animal (PSA), Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria (INIA), Estación Experimental La Estanzuela, Colonia, Uruguay.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3390-9723
María Laura CasauxPlataforma de Investigación en Salud Animal (PSA), Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria (INIA), Estación Experimental La Estanzuela, Colonia, Uruguay.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6736-4816
Marina Maurente BerónPlataforma de Investigación en Salud Animal (PSA), Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria (INIA), Estación Experimental La Estanzuela, Colonia, Uruguay.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8876-2568
Ludmila SlimovichPlataforma de Investigación en Salud Animal (PSA), Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria (INIA), Estación Experimental La Estanzuela, Colonia, Uruguay.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8843-3411
Raissa Moreira de MoraisPlataforma de Investigación en Salud Animal (PSA), Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria (INIA), Estación Experimental La Estanzuela, Colonia, Uruguay.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4369-3586
Sofía Fernández-CigandaPlataforma de Investigación en Salud Animal (PSA), Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria (INIA), Estación Experimental La Estanzuela, Colonia, Uruguay.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0819-7499
Mariano CarossinoLouisiana Animal Disease Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Pathobiological Sciences, School of Veterinary Medicine, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3864-5915
Rosalía MoralesPlataforma de Investigación en Salud Animal (PSA), Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria (INIA), Estación Experimental La Estanzuela, Colonia, Uruguay.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0000-6778-1209
Camila García PintosPlataforma de Investigación en Salud Animal (PSA), Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria (INIA), Estación Experimental La Estanzuela, Colonia, Uruguay.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0004-2724-3114
Mizael MachadoPlataforma de Investigación en Salud Animal (PSA), Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria (INIA), Estación Experimental Tacuarembó, Tacuarembó, Uruguay.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2029-884X
Alejo MenchacaPlataforma de Investigación en Salud Animal (PSA), Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria (INIA), Estación Experimental La Estanzuela, Colonia, Uruguay.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2494-9574
Franklin Riet-CorreaPrograma de Posgrados, Facultad de Veterinaria, Universidad de la República (UdelaR), Montevideo, Uruguay.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5738-7785
Funding
Fondo de Promoción de Tecnología Agropecuaria FPTA 366Instituto Nacional de Investigacion Agropecuaria, Uruguay PL_27 and ASA_03Louisiana State University PG009641
6 · The paper itself
Abstract
Ureaplasma diversum is an opportunistic Mollicute associated with reproductive losses in cattle. Reports of this disease are scarce in South America. This study documents three sporadic cases of U. diversum–associated abortion and/or stillbirth occurring in three different beef cattle herds, as well as a cluster of three neonatal losses affecting a fourth herd in Uruguay. Diagnosis was based on histopathological findings, PCR, and systematic exclusion of other major abortifacient pathogens. The cases of abortion/stillbirth had fibrinosuppurative and necrotizing placentitis and fetal bronchopneumonia, whereas neonatal cases presented mild polyarthritis, interstitial pneumonia, and, in one calf, multisystemic inflammation. Ureaplasma diversum was detected by PCR in the placenta and/or lung in all six cases, and intralesional localization of U. diversum was demonstrated, for the first time, by in situ hybridization in two abortion cases. PCR was also performed from endometrial samples taken by cytobrush from 80 cows in the herd with the cluster of cases of perinatal mortality, showing no differences (p = 0.56) in the presence of U. diversum between affected (20%, 8/40) and unaffected groups (15%, 6/40). These findings highlight U. diversum as an emerging cause of reproductive and early postnatal losses in beef cattle in Uruguay and justify the inclusion of PCR for this pathogen in the differential diagnosis in cases of abortion, stillbirth, and neonatal death.
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.
Abortions, stillbirth, and neonatal deaths caused by Ureaplasma diversum in beef cattle in Uruguay. · full record | OpenQuestion