ArticleIUCrJ2026
Benchmarking 3D electron diffraction strategies for ceramics.
Article in IUCrJ, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The measurement method matters.IUCrJ · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Three-dimensional electron diffraction (3D ED) has become increasingly popular over the last two decades, challenging the limits of established single-crystal X-ray diffraction experiments. In particular, continuous-rotation and precession-assisted protocols have been established as important tools in the collection of electron diffraction data, and the data for most of the crystal structures solved by 3D ED nowadays are acquired with one of these two methods. This is particularly true for ceramic materials, where 3D ED allows deep insights into complex structure-property relationships. As ceramic syntheses tend to yield thick and highly crystalline particles, one issue in the refinement against electron diffraction data is the effect of coherent inelastic scattering. While dynamical refinement procedures allow the simulation of multiple scattering events, in general they ignore the inelastic contribution. This work aims to evaluate the impact of dynamical inelastic effects on the diffraction data of ceramics and how their overall quality depends on the measurement strategy used. This was done by comparing the structure models derived from the same crystals under similar experimental conditions of three ceramic compounds, namely NATP [Na
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.