Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42043323›Full record

ArticleIUCrJ2026

Benchmarking 3D electron diffraction strategies for ceramics.

Yann Schmitt, Sergi Plana-Ruiz, Yaşar Krysiak

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in IUCrJ, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Yann SchmittInstitute of Inorganic Chemistry, Leibniz Universität Hannover, Callinstraße 9, 30167 Hannover, Germany.
Sergi Plana-RuizUnitat de Cristal·lografia i Mineralogia, Department de Geologia, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 08193 Cerdanyola del Vallès, Catalonia, Spain.
Yaşar KrysiakInstitute of Inorganic Chemistry, Leibniz Universität Hannover, Callinstraße 9, 30167 Hannover, Germany.

Funding

Deutsche Bundesstiftung Umwelt 20023/034Fonds der Chemischen Industrie SK 216/09
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Three-dimensional electron diffraction (3D ED) has become increasingly popular over the last two decades, challenging the limits of established single-crystal X-ray diffraction experiments. In particular, continuous-rotation and precession-assisted protocols have been established as important tools in the collection of electron diffraction data, and the data for most of the crystal structures solved by 3D ED nowadays are acquired with one of these two methods. This is particularly true for ceramic materials, where 3D ED allows deep insights into complex structure-property relationships. As ceramic syntheses tend to yield thick and highly crystalline particles, one issue in the refinement against electron diffraction data is the effect of coherent inelastic scattering. While dynamical refinement procedures allow the simulation of multiple scattering events, in general they ignore the inelastic contribution. This work aims to evaluate the impact of dynamical inelastic effects on the diffraction data of ceramics and how their overall quality depends on the measurement strategy used. This was done by comparing the structure models derived from the same crystals under similar experimental conditions of three ceramic compounds, namely NATP [Na

Indexed as

3D EDalmandineceramicscontinuous-rotation electron diffractiondynamical scatteringKikuchi linesNASICONprecession electron diffraction

Identifiers

PMID42043323
PMCPMC13134496

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.