ArticleAmerican journal of primatology2026
Age-Related Differences in Short Term Spatial Memory in Rhesus Macaques.
Article in American journal of primatology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Previous studies revealed deficits in working memory among old macaques (> 20 years old) compared to younger macaques (< 14 years old) but have not thoroughly assessed these metrics in middle-aged macaques (14-19 years old). Here, we sought to develop a high-throughput adaptation of the 2-choice delayed response task of spatial working memory suitable to query middle-aged macaques in comparison to young-adult and very old rhesus macaques. We administered our manual 3-choice delayed response task to male and female monkeys ranging in age from 7 to 27 years, and included 3 choice locations to avoid floor effects and improve task sensitivity. Critically, Acquisition was limited to 15 blocks of 30 trials and used a short 1-second delay. Spatial memory was then probed using variable delays of 5, 10, 30, and 60 s. Retrieval accuracy (percent correct) significantly decreased with increasing delay length and age, as expected. In addition, we developed a new method to quantify the temporal and spatial distribution of responses and assess perseverative responding. The results identified age-dependent differences in memory, learning and perseveration, suggesting a decline in cognitive flexibility in late adulthood contributed to the memory deficits measured here. This task refinement therefore provides a novel approach to quantify errors in this age-sensitive short-term spatial memory task.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.