ReviewViruses2026
Oncolytic Virotherapy and Immunogenic Cell Death: Mechanisms, Platforms, and Clinical Translation.
Review in Viruses, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- From monoclonal to polyfunctional immunotherapy: Reprogramming CAR-T-cell therapy with oncolytic viruses in B-cell malignancies.HemaSphere · 2026Article
- The interplay between oncolytic viruses, Toll-like receptor signaling, and chemotherapy in overcoming tumor immune tolerance.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Oncolytic viruses represent a paradigm-shifting approach to cancer immunotherapy, functioning as in situ vaccines that convert immunologically "cold" tumors into "hot" tumors through induction of immunogenic cell death (ICD). Despite the clinical success of checkpoint inhibitors targeting programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1)/programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) and cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 (CTLA-4), many patients exhibit primary or acquired resistance due to insufficient tumor immunogenicity and exclusion of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes. Oncolytic viruses address this limitation by selectively replicating in tumor cells, inducing robust ICD characterized by four cardinal hallmarks: calreticulin exposure, ATP secretion, HMGB1 release, and type I interferon production. This review systematically examines the molecular mechanisms underlying virus-induced ICD, compares DNA virus platforms (Vaccinia, HSV-1, Adenovirus) with RNA virus platforms (Coxsackieviruses A21, A11, and B3), and analyzes clinical trial data demonstrating synergistic efficacy when combined with checkpoint inhibitors. Notably, RNA viruses generate higher type I interferon responses compared to DNA viruses, correlating with superior clinical outcomes. Coxsackievirus A21 combined with pembrolizumab achieved a 47% objective response rate in melanoma in the CAPRA trial, representing notable efficacy exceeding either monotherapy. Coxsackievirus A11 demonstrates exceptional selectivity for thoracic cancers through ICAM-1-dependent receptor tropism and potent immunogenic cell death induction. Japanese researchers have pioneered microRNA-targeted Coxsackievirus B3, achieving cardiac safety attenuation while preserving complete oncolytic potency and ICD-inducing capacity. This comprehensive analysis synthesizes molecular mechanisms, platform comparisons, clinical efficacy data, and translational challenges to guide future development of oncolytic virotherapy as a cornerstone of cancer immunotherapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.