Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42043121›Full record

ArticleToxics2026

Validation of the Epi2SensA Method Using the EpiDerm™ Model for Skin Sensitization Testing Under OECD TG442D.

Christian Pellevoisin, Hajime Kojima, Sebastian Hoffmann, Takao Ashikaga, Timothy Landry, Celina Romero, Kalyani Guntur, Mitchell Klausner, Jennifer Stadnicki, Helge Gehrke and 9 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Toxics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Christian PellevoisinMattek Corporation Now Part of Sartorius, Ashland, MA 01721, USA.
Hajime KojimaDepartment of Pharmaceutical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Sanyo-Onoda City University, Yamaguchi 756-0884, Japan.
Sebastian HoffmannSeh Consulting + Services, 33106 Paderborn, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-3214-7678
Takao AshikagaNational Institute of Health Sciences, Kawasaki 201-0821, Japan.
Timothy LandryMattek Corporation Now Part of Sartorius, Ashland, MA 01721, USA.ORCID 0009-0002-2755-1884
Celina RomeroMattek Corporation Now Part of Sartorius, Ashland, MA 01721, USA.
Kalyani GunturMattek Corporation Now Part of Sartorius, Ashland, MA 01721, USA.
Mitchell KlausnerMattek Corporation Now Part of Sartorius, Ashland, MA 01721, USA.
Jennifer StadnickiMattek Corporation Now Part of Sartorius, Ashland, MA 01721, USA.
Helge GehrkeEurofins Medical Device Testing Munich GmbH, D-82152 Planegg, Germany.
Robert Mills-GoodletEurofins Medical Device Testing Munich GmbH, D-82152 Planegg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-7581-6771
Niki PanousiEurofins Medical Device Testing Munich GmbH, D-82152 Planegg, Germany.
Victor J JohnsonBurleson Research Technologies, Inc., Morrisville, NC 27560, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3471-6483
Gary R BurlesonBurleson Research Technologies, Inc., Morrisville, NC 27560, USA.
Kazuto NaritaFood and Drug Safety Center, Hadano 729-5, Japan.
Shigehiro TachibanaFood and Drug Safety Center, Hadano 729-5, Japan.
Kohichi KojimaFood and Drug Safety Center, Hadano 729-5, Japan.
Jan MarkusMattek In Vitro Life Science Laboratories, Now Part of Sartorius, 821 05 Bratislava, Slovakia.
Alexander ArmentoMattek Corporation Now Part of Sartorius, Ashland, MA 01721, USA.

Funding

Ministry of Health Labour and Welfare 24KD2002NIEHS NIH HHS HHSN273201400017C
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Epi2SensA method is a method similar to the validated EpiSensA assay for assessing the skin sensitization potential of chemicals. The Epi2SensA protocol includes adaptation (changes to exposure conditions and the controls) for using an alternative reconstructed human epidermis (RhE) model, the EpiDerm™ model. The interlaboratory validation study evaluated the reliability and predictive capacity of Epi2SensA according to OECD Performance Standards. Four laboratories (Mattek, Now Part of Sartorius, Eurofins Munich, Burleson Research Technologies, Inc., and Food and Drug Safety Center) conducted blinded testing of 20 coded reference substances representing various chemical categories and sensitization potencies. Statistical analysis using modified acceptance criteria (a 60% cell viability threshold) and a modified prediction model (requiring at least two positive gene markers) demonstrated substantially improved performance compared to the original EpiSensA criteria. The between-laboratory reproducibility (BLR) was 85%, the average within-laboratory reproducibility (WLR) was 83.3%, and the average predictivity parameters were 88.1% for sensitivity, 88.9% for specificity, and 88.3% for accuracy. Epi2SensA achieved performance metrics comparable to the validated reference method (EpiSensA), supporting regulatory acceptance of the Epi2SensA assay using the EpiDerm™ model (Mattek Corporation, Now Part of Sartorius, Ashland, MA, USA) as an alternative RhE source for OECD TG 442D skin sensitization testing.

Indexed as

alternative testing methodsEpi2SensAinterlaboratory validationin vitro assaykeratinocyte activationOECD TG 442Dreconstructed human epidermisskin sensitization

Identifiers

PMID42043121
PMCPMC13120447

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.