ArticleToxics2026
Validation of the Epi2SensA Method Using the EpiDerm™ Model for Skin Sensitization Testing Under OECD TG442D.
Article in Toxics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The Epi2SensA method is a method similar to the validated EpiSensA assay for assessing the skin sensitization potential of chemicals. The Epi2SensA protocol includes adaptation (changes to exposure conditions and the controls) for using an alternative reconstructed human epidermis (RhE) model, the EpiDerm™ model. The interlaboratory validation study evaluated the reliability and predictive capacity of Epi2SensA according to OECD Performance Standards. Four laboratories (Mattek, Now Part of Sartorius, Eurofins Munich, Burleson Research Technologies, Inc., and Food and Drug Safety Center) conducted blinded testing of 20 coded reference substances representing various chemical categories and sensitization potencies. Statistical analysis using modified acceptance criteria (a 60% cell viability threshold) and a modified prediction model (requiring at least two positive gene markers) demonstrated substantially improved performance compared to the original EpiSensA criteria. The between-laboratory reproducibility (BLR) was 85%, the average within-laboratory reproducibility (WLR) was 83.3%, and the average predictivity parameters were 88.1% for sensitivity, 88.9% for specificity, and 88.3% for accuracy. Epi2SensA achieved performance metrics comparable to the validated reference method (EpiSensA), supporting regulatory acceptance of the Epi2SensA assay using the EpiDerm™ model (Mattek Corporation, Now Part of Sartorius, Ashland, MA, USA) as an alternative RhE source for OECD TG 442D skin sensitization testing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.