ArticleToxics2026
Heavy Metals in Iron Tailing Around River Sediments of Xiangshan: Status, Risks, and Human Health Threats.
Article in Toxics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The heavy metal pollution linked to extractive activities has attracted broad public attention. To examine the current state of heavy metal pollution in river sediments around iron tailing zones, this study was carried out to evaluate the distribution features, potential sources, and environmental hazards of heavy metals (HMs, Cr, Cd, Ni, Cu, Zn, Pb, As, and Hg) in the surface sediments of rivers in the Xiangshan area of Ma'anshan City. Results indicated that, except for Cr, the mean heavy metal concentrations exceeded the soil background levels in Anhui's Huaihe River Basin. Variability in metal concentrations among the sediments was moderate, exhibiting an uneven spatial distribution. Significant positive correlations were detected between various HMs in the sediments, suggesting a common pollution source. Source analysis findings revealed that the HMs primarily originate from agricultural fertilization, mining, and smelting activities. Evaluation results from both the single-factor pollution index and the Nemerow comprehensive index indicated that the upstream section of the Caishi River is severely polluted by HMs. The potential ecological risk index evaluation results demonstrated that 85% of sediment samples from sampling points achieved a high comprehensive potential ecological risk level for HMs, with Cd, Cu, and Hg identified as the key contributors. The human health risk assessment demonstrated that both adults and children are subjected to carcinogenic risks from heavy metal exposure, with children exhibiting a higher risk level. This study offers valuable insights into managing heavy metal contamination in river sediments adjacent to iron tailings regions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.