ReviewToxins2026
Muscle-Specific Dosing of OnabotulinumtoxinA in Post-Stroke Upper-Limb Spasticity: A Descriptive Literature Review.
Review in Toxins, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Temporal Neuromuscular Adaptations and Proteomic Signatures Following Botulinum Neurotoxin A Injection in Spastic Hemiplegia Rats.CNS neuroscience & therapeutics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundBotulinum neurotoxin type A is widely used in the management of post-stroke upper-limb spasticity; however, many studies report total injected doses rather than muscle-specific dosing, limiting clinical applicability. This study aimed to evaluate how frequently muscle-level dosing protocols of onabotulinumtoxinA are reported and to assess consistency of dosing patterns across published studies.
methodsA literature search was conducted in PubMed, Wiley/Cochrane Library, and EBSCO/CINAHL using a structured search strategy informed by PRISMA guidelines. Studies published within the last 10 years reporting on onabotulinumtoxinA treatment in post-stroke upper-limb spasticity with muscle-specific dosing data were included. Studies not providing muscle-level dosing or not allowing extraction of post-stroke upper-limb data were excluded. Data were summarized descriptively and compared across studies.
resultsTwenty-seven full-text articles were assessed, and five studies met the inclusion criteria. Muscle-specific dosing was consistently reported for commonly treated muscles such as biceps brachii and wrist and finger flexors, whereas other muscles were less frequently targeted. Variability in dosing between studies was observed, particularly in multicenter real-world datasets. Standardized high-dose protocols contrasted with individualized dosing strategies, which generally showed more moderate dose ranges. Expert recommendations often suggest higher doses than those observed in routine clinical practice.
conclusionsMuscle-specific dosing of onabotulinumtoxinA in post-stroke upper-limb spasticity is reported infrequently, and substantial variability exists between studies and clinical practice. Standardized reporting of muscle-level dosing and its relationship to baseline spasticity severity is needed to improve clinical applicability and reproducibility.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.