ArticleToxins2026
Lessons Learned from a Military-Biotechnology Partnership to Develop a Broad-Spectrum Small-Molecule Inhibitor for Snakebite Envenoming.
Article in Toxins, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Snakebite envenoming causes an estimated 138,000 deaths annually worldwide, with approximately 75% of fatalities occurring prior to arrival at definitive medical care. Even in regions where antivenom is available in hospitals, the absence of treatment options before a victim can reach definitive care results in delays of many hours before therapy is initiated. Manufacturing complexity, region-specific products, and the risk of anaphylaxis further limit the availability and use of antivenom in many regions. Reducing the persistently high mortality of snakebite envenoming requires both novel scientific approaches and partnerships that extend beyond traditional disciplinary and funding silos. This article describes the collaboration between Ophirex, a Public Benefit Corporation developing the oral secretory phospholipase A2 (sPLA2) inhibitor varespladib, and the United States military, which has identified a capability gap in snakebite treatment for forward-deployed personnel. The partnership was driven by a shared requirement for a shelf-stable, easy-to-administer, snake-species-agnostic therapy suitable for use prior to definitive medical care. A central insight of the program was that military operational requirements and global public health needs converged around the same product characteristics, enabling a strategically aligned development effort. From early proof-of-concept studies through regulatory pathway definition and advanced development, the Military-Ophirex partnership integrated operational requirements, regulatory planning, and iterative risk mitigation to advance manufacturing, nonclinical, and clinical development. This work provides both practical insights into complex drug development and a case study in how structured partnerships can carry innovation through translation in underfunded and operationally challenging conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.