ReviewToxins2026
Advances in Targeted Toxin Therapy for Malignant Gliomas: A Narrative Review.
Review in Toxins, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Malignant gliomas remain highly treatment-resistant brain tumors despite surgery and adjuvant therapies. Targeted toxin therapies represent a unique strategy that exploits receptor-mediated cellular internalization to deliver cytotoxic components that result in the irreversible inhibition of protein synthesis independent of DNA damage or cell-cycle status. Advances in molecular profiling, toxin engineering, and delivery development have refined components targeting IL4Rα, IL13Rα2, EGFR/EGFRvIII, uPAR, and the transferrin receptor. Early clinical studies demonstrated biological activity, acceptable safety, and durable responses in subsets of patients, validating the fundamental mechanism of this approach. However, late-phase trials failed to demonstrate a population-level survival benefit, largely due to variability in delivery, receptor heterogeneity, and limitations in trial design rather than insufficient cytotoxic potency. Recent progress has focused on multiple receptor-targeting and delivery systems capable of achieving reliable intratumoral distribution. MRI-guided convection-enhanced delivery, vector-mediated toxin expression, and blood-brain barrier penetrant nanocarriers now enable more precise tumor targeting. Emerging evidence also reveals that toxin-mediated cytotoxicity can enhance antitumor immune responses, supporting their integration with immunotherapy. These advances position targeted toxins as precision cytotoxic compounds whose success depends on coordinated molecular targeting, delivery optimization, and biologically stratified patient selection, establishing a translational pathway for future glioma therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.