Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42043023›Full record

ReviewToxins2026

Botulinum Toxin as Targeted Neuromodulation in Complex Regional Pain Syndrome: An Anatomy-Informed Mechanistic Review.

Areerat Suputtitada

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Toxins, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Areerat SuputtitadaDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok 10330, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0002-9920-7188

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) is a heterogeneous and disabling chronic pain condition characterized by maladaptive neuroplasticity involving persistent peripheral nociceptive input, autonomic dysregulation, and central sensitization. Despite increasing clinical use, the role of botulinum toxin in CRPS remains controversial, with inconsistent outcomes reported across studies. This review synthesizes mechanistic, translational, and clinical evidence suggesting that these apparent inconsistencies may be partly explained by heterogeneity in anatomical targeting and route of administration rather than absence of biological efficacy. Available evidence suggests that botulinum toxin may exhibit its most consistent therapeutic signal when delivered to neural structures directly implicated in dominant CRPS pathophysiology, particularly the sympathetic nervous system and proximal somatic afferents, whereas superficial or non-specific delivery strategies appear to yield more variable responses. Importantly, differences across anatomical targets should not be interpreted as evidence of comparative effectiveness, as observed variation may reflect phenotype selection, procedural heterogeneity, confounding, and differences in outcome reporting. By integrating experimental data, randomized trials, and case-based clinical evidence, an anatomy-informed, route-specific neuromodulation framework is proposed to reconcile existing findings and inform future research. This mechanism-informed perspective is intended to guide rational trial design and phenotype-aligned clinical application of botulinum toxin in CRPS, rather than to provide a definitive evidence-closing synthesis.

Indexed as

Botulinum ToxinsComplex Regional Pain SyndromesAnimalsHumansBotulinum Toxinsbotulinum toxincomplex regional pain syndromeneuromodulationnociplastic painpain phenotypingsympathetic nervous system

Identifiers

PMID42043023
PMCPMC13119950

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.