ArticleTropical medicine and infectious disease2026
Urban Animal Exposures and Rabies Post-Exposure Prophylaxis in Istanbul, Turkey: Insights from a Metropolitan Emergency Department.
Article in Tropical medicine and infectious disease, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRabies remains a major zoonotic disease worldwide, particularly in regions with large populations of free-roaming animals. In urban settings, animal-related injuries constitute a substantial healthcare burden and frequently result in the administration of rabies post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP). This study aimed to evaluate the epidemiological characteristics of animal exposures and real-world PEP practices in a metropolitan emergency department.
methodsThis retrospective descriptive study included 1960 patients presenting to a tertiary metropolitan emergency department between 1 March and 1 September 2025 with suspected animal exposure. Demographic data, animal species involved, exposure mechanisms, animal ownership and vaccination status, time to presentation, and PEP practices were analyzed using descriptive statistics.
resultsMost exposures were cat-related (86.3%) and were caused by scratching (81.5%). Nearly all injuries were superficial (99.8%), while deep injuries were rare (0.2%). The majority of animals were classified as strays (90.1%), and vaccination status was unknown in 81.2% of cases. Rabies immunoglobulin was administered to only 0.6% of patients; however, rabies vaccination was initiated in 98.8% of patients. Approximately 74.5% of patients presented within 24 h. Post-exposure animal observation was documented in only 20.2% of cases.
conclusionsUrban animal exposures in this metropolitan setting were predominantly superficial and cat-related, yet nearly all patients received rabies vaccination. Limited animal observation and incomplete vaccination documentation appear to constrain risk stratification and may contribute to the use of precautionary PEP. Strengthening surveillance systems, improving documentation, and implementing evidence-based risk-stratification strategies are essential for optimizing rabies prophylaxis practices in urban environments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.