ArticleVaccines2026
Modernizing Vaccination Data System: Design, Development, and Deployment of a Digital Vaccination Registry in Liberia, 2023-2025.
Article in Vaccines, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundLiberia modernized vaccination data systems in 2023-2025 by piloting a District Health Information System (DHIS2)-based Digital Vaccination Registry (Electronic Immunization Registry, EIR) to address the limitations of paper-based workflows and of a proprietary COVID-19 electronic platform (offline gaps, lack of unique identifiers, performance issues and cost).
objectiveTo assess a pilot platform by evaluating training, registry use and device management, utility for routine immunization, vaccine logistics and Adverse Events Following Immunization (AEFI) data, and routine immunization data quality in the DHIS2 mobile application compared with paper registers.
methodsUsing the Public Health Informatics Institute's Collaborative Requirements Development Methodology, stakeholders defined requirements, trained users and implemented a pilot. Mixed methods were used; a mini data audit was performed, and qualitative data were collected across 19 facilities in Montserrado, Gbarpolu and Grand Bassa. Seventy-eight health workers were trained to use the DHIS2 mobile application.
resultsThe future state design replaces paper aggregation steps with real-time mobile entry to a national registry and dashboard. Dual entry persisted during high-volume periods. The mini data audit found discrepancies between facility paper registers and DHIS2-EIR entries for child enrollment data and, Bacillus Calmette Guérin and Diphtheria-Pertussis-Tetanus dose administration records Participants attributed these discrepancies to internet and device problems and challenges navigating the system. Participants requested a training manual, improved connectivity at point of service, integration with supportive supervision, additional staff and system features (field to record hospital number, automated next visit date, and vaccination status prompts).
conclusionsLessons from the pilot will inform country-wide implementation, including planned linkage with electronic birth and death registration to enable a unique child identifier and reduce manual errors and delays.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.