ArticleNanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Prediction of Composite Supercapacitor Performance Through Combining Machine Learning with Novel Binder-Related Features.
Article in Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The development of high-performance composite supercapacitors remains challenging because the specific capacitance of composite electrodes is jointly governed by electronic percolation, ion accessibility, and interfacial contact, all of which are strongly affected by the balance among active materials, conductive agents, and binders. Traditional equivalent circuit modeling and empirical trial-and-error methods are often inadequate for describing these non-linear relationships and optimizing electrode design. To address this limitation, we establish a physics-guided and interpretable machine learning (ML) framework for predicting the specific capacitance of composite electrodes. Unlike traditional methods that rely on macroscopic mass fractions, our approach constructs a feature space comprising ten descriptors, including two newly introduced binder-related proxy descriptors-Binder-to-Conductive Ratio (BCR) and Specific Binder Loading (SBL)-to better represent the influence of binder content. By systematically evaluating 17 machine learning algorithms on a high-fidelity dataset, we identify the XGBoost model, optimized via Bayesian optimization, as the best predictor, achieving a coefficient of determination (R
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.