Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42042615›Full record

ArticleMethods and protocols2026

Stereological Assessment of Locus Coeruleus in the Mouse: A Methodological Study in Pups and Adult Animals.

Marco Scotto, Alessandro Galgani, Marina Boido, Nooria Mohammady, Alessandro Vercelli, Filippo S Giorgi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Methods and protocols, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Marco ScottoSant'Anna School of Advanced Studies, 56125 Pisa, Italy.ORCID 0009-0003-0630-1891
Alessandro GalganiDepartment of Translational Research and of New Surgical and Medical Technologies, University of Pisa, 56125 Pisa, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-1894-4128
Marina BoidoDepartment of Neuroscience Rita Levi Montalcini, University of Turin, 10126 Turin, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-1211-1552
Nooria MohammadyDepartment of Biology, University of Pisa, 56125 Pisa, Italy.
Alessandro VercelliDepartment of Neuroscience Rita Levi Montalcini, University of Turin, 10126 Turin, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-5909-2128
Filippo S GiorgiDepartment of Translational Research and of New Surgical and Medical Technologies, University of Pisa, 56125 Pisa, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-2940-8128

Funding

Fondazione Pisa 303/22Ministero della Salute Ricerca Corrente 2025
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Unbiased stereology represents the most accurate approach for estimating the total number of neurons of specific brain regions; however, its reliability critically depends on the use of rigorously defined and anatomically appropriate sampling parameters. The brain nucleus Locus Coeruleus (LC) plays a key role in several brain functions. LC impairment has been associated with a range of disorders affecting individuals across the lifespan, from infancy to adulthood. In animal models of these conditions, precise estimation of LC neuronal number is essential. The LC analysis poses specific methodological challenges due to its small size, indistinct anatomical boundaries, and age-dependent changes in neuronal density. In this study, we present a detailed and reproducible stereological workflow for the quantification of LC neurons in the mouse brain across the lifespan. Using C57BL/6J mice at postnatal, adult, and aged stages, we optimized all key components of the Optical Fractionator method, LC neurons were identified by immunoperoxidase staining for tyrosine hydroxylase (TH) and quantified using systematic-random sampling implemented in Stereo Investigator

Indexed as

infancyLocus Coeruleusmiddle agemouse brainneurodegenerationneurodevelopmental disordersnoradrenalinestereology

Identifiers

PMID42042615
PMCPMC13118734

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.