ReviewMethods and protocols2026
Phenolic Compounds and Antioxidant Activity: Analytical Methods and Current Knowledge-A Review.
Review in Methods and protocols, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Effect of Polyphenol Supplementation on Post-Exercise Recovery in Adult Male Soccer Players: A Systematic Review.Nutrients · 2026Pooled it
- Comparative Phytochemical Profiling, Antioxidant Activity, and Chondrocyte Cytocompatibility of Water and Ethanolic Extracts from Different Organs of Golden Gardenia (Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Editorial for the Special Issue "Advances in Phenolic Based Complexes".Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Ethnopharmacological Validation of SelectedPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Phenolic compounds are plant-derived antioxidants crucial for human health and food preservation. Their bioactive potential including anti-inflammatory, antimicrobial, and anti-carcinogenic properties makes them a vital focus in nutritional, pharmaceutical, and agricultural research. This review critically evaluates the methodologies for their extraction, detection, and quantification to accurately assess antioxidant activity. Oxidative stress in biological systems and food matrices necessitates accurate analytical methodologies for assessing antioxidant behavior, which include both in vitro, in vivo and ex vivo approaches. Sample pretreatment and extraction techniques are critical for reliable analysis and vary depending on the matrix, compound polarity, and target phenolic subclass. We compare conventional extraction techniques (Soxhlet, maceration) with advanced methods like ultrasound-assisted, microwave-assisted, and supercritical fluid extraction. Detection methods reviewed include spectrophotometric assays (e.g., DPPH, FRAP, ORAC), electrochemical sensors, and chromatographic techniques (e.g., HPLC, HPLC-MS). While each method has distinct advantages, a lack of standardization remains the primary challenge, driven by variations in protocols and the vast chemical diversity of phenolics. This review underscores the critical need for integrated, standardized approaches to ensure the accurate and comparable evaluation of antioxidant activity in research and industry.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.