Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42042604›Full record

ArticleMethods and protocols2026

Detection of Certain Berries in Difficult Samples by Singleplex and Multiplex Real-Time PCR-HRM: A Case Study of Pitfalls.

Lenka Fialova, Ivana Marova

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Methods and protocols, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Lenka FialovaFaculty of Chemistry, Brno University of Technology, 612 00 Brno, Czech Republic.
Ivana MarovaFaculty of Chemistry, Brno University of Technology, 612 00 Brno, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0002-2095-1837

Funding

Brno University of Technology FCH-S-26-9000
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Singleplex and multiplex real-time PCR-HRM (polymerase chain reaction with high resolution melting), both with specific and non-specific amplicon detection, are used for a wide range of applications, from clinical diagnostics to food authentication. However, their results can be influenced by the quality of the template DNA and composition of the reaction mixture. The methods used for the analysis of these results then influence the conclusions drawn. In this work we present an example from our laboratory practice, where the results of singleplex and multiplex real-time PCR differed, despite using the same reaction conditions, primers and analyzed plant material. We show the influence of a singleplex and multiplex PCR setup on the results, as well as the influence of template contamination on the melting behaviour of amplicons. We also discuss the usefulness of cluster analysis for the clarification of real-time PCR-HRM results which appear unclear when only melting and difference curves or similarity scores are used for the analysis of these results. We provide a discussion of problems which we encountered during an analysis of commercial teas and which should be considered by researchers new to PCR-based analysis of plant material, especially if the studied material is rich in various contaminants.

Indexed as

berriesmultiplex PCRPCR inhibitorsplant DNA isolationreal-time PCR-HRM

Identifiers

PMID42042604
PMCPMC13119197

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.