Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42042518›Full record

ArticleJournal of imaging2026

SurveyNet: A Unified Deep Learning Framework for OCR and OMR-Based Survey Digitization.

Rubi Quiñones, Sreeja Cheekireddy, Eren Gultepe

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of imaging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Rubi QuiñonesDepartment of Computer Science, Southern Illinois University Edwardsville, Edwardsville, IL 62026, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5944-4528
Sreeja CheekireddyDepartment of Computer Science, Southern Illinois University Edwardsville, Edwardsville, IL 62026, USA.
Eren GultepeDepartment of Computer Science, Southern Illinois University Edwardsville, Edwardsville, IL 62026, USA.ORCID 0009-0000-3885-5782

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Manual survey data entry remains a bottleneck in large-scale research, marketing, and public policy, where survey sheets are still widely used due to accessibility and high response rates. Despite the progress in Optical Character Recognition (OCR) and Optical Mark Recognition (OMR), existing systems treat these tasks separately and are typically tailored to clean, standardized forms, making them unreliable for real-world survey sheets with diverse markings and handwritten inputs. These limitations hinder automation and introduce significant error rates in data transcription. To address this, we propose SurveyNet, a unified deep learning framework that combines OCR and OMR capabilities to automatically digitize complex survey responses within a single model. SurveyNet processes both handwritten digits and a wide variety of mark types including ticks, circles, and crosses across multiple question formats. We also introduce SurveySet, a novel dataset comprising 135 real-world survey forms annotated across four key response types. Experimental results demonstrate that SurveyNet achieves between 50% and 97% classification accuracy across tasks, with strong performance even on small and imbalanced datasets. This framework offers a scalable solution for streamlining survey digitization workflows, reducing manual errors, and enabling timely analysis in domains ranging from consumer research to public health and education.

Indexed as

convolutional neural networks (CNN)data automationdeep learningform processinghandwritten digit recognitionimage classificationoptical character recognition (OCR)optical mark recognition (OMR)real-world datasetsurvey digitization

Identifiers

PMID42042518
PMCPMC13117292

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.