ArticleJournal of imaging2026
Morphological Convolutional Neural Network for Efficient Facial Expression Recognition.
Article in Journal of imaging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study proposes a morphological convolutional neural network (MCNN) architecture that integrates morphological operations with CNN layers for facial expression recognition (FER). Conventional CNN-based FER models primarily rely on appearance features and may be sensitive to illumination and demographic variations. This work investigates whether morphological structural representations provide complementary information to convolutional features. A multi-source and multi-ethnic FER dataset was constructed by combining CK+, JAFFE, KDEF, TFEID, and a newly collected Indonesian Facial Expression dataset, resulting in 3684 images from 326 subjects across seven expression classes. Subject-independent data splitting with 10-fold cross-validation was applied to ensure reliable evaluation. Experimental results show that the proposed MCNN1 model achieves an average accuracy of 88.16%, while the best MCNN2 variant achieves 88.7%, demonstrating competitive performance compared to MobileNetV2 (88.27%), VGG19 (87.58%), and the morphological baseline MNN (50.73%). The proposed model also demonstrates improved computational efficiency, achieving lower inference latency (21%) and reduced GPU memory usage (64%) compared to baseline models. These results indicate that integrating morphological representations into convolutional architectures provides a modest but consistent improvement in FER performance while enhancing generalization and efficiency under heterogeneous data conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.