ArticleJournal of imaging2026
Novel, Contrast Echocardiography-Based Trabeculation Quantification Method in the Diagnosis of Left Ventricular Excessive Trabeculation.
Article in Journal of imaging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cardiac MRI (CMR) is the gold standard for diagnosing left ventricular excessive trabeculation (LVET), whereas echocardiography (Echo) often does not yield a definitive diagnosis. The use of ultrasound contrast material offers the potential for more accurate imaging of the trabecular system; however, we do not yet have diagnostic criteria developed specifically for contrast Echo (CE-Echo). We aimed to determine the role of CE-Echo in the diagnosis of LVET and to propose a novel method for quantifying trabeculation. We included 55 LVET subjects and 54 age- and sex-matched healthy Control subjects. All subjects underwent non-contrast Echo, CE-Echo, and CMR examinations. In addition to volumetric parameters and ejection fraction (EF), we measured the area of the trabeculated layer and its ratio to the LV area (Trab/LV_area) on apical CE-Echo views. Based on the CMR-derived diagnosis, the Trab/LV_area ratio identified individuals with LVET with high specificity (98%) and sensitivity (95%) when the average of the apical views reached 17% (AUC = 0.98), or when it exceeded 20% in at least one view (AUC = 0.96). The use of CE-Echo may assist in the quantitative diagnosis of LVET in addition to its morphological assessment, and the Trab_area/LVarea may be a good additional criterion in the diagnosis of LVET.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.