ReviewJournal of imaging2026
Artificial Intelligence in Pulmonary Endoscopy: Current Evidence, Limitations, and Future Directions.
Review in Journal of imaging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Artificial Intelligence and Endobronchial Ultrasound for Lymph-Node Detection and Characterization: A Pioneer Multicenter Transatlantic Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundArtificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly applied in pulmonary endoscopy, including diagnostic bronchoscopy, interventional pulmonology and endobronchial imaging. Advances in computer vision, machine learning and robotic systems have expanded the potential for automated lesion detection, navigation to peripheral pulmonary lesions, and real-time procedural support. However, the current evidence base remains heterogeneous, and translational challenges persist.
methodsThis review summarizes current applications and developments of AI across white-light bronchoscopy (WLB), image-enhanced bronchoscopy (e.g., narrow-band imaging and autofluorescence imaging), endobronchial ultrasound (EBUS), virtual and robotic bronchoscopies, and workflow optimization and training. The authors also examine the methodological limitations, regulatory considerations, and implementation barriers that affect translation into routine practice.
resultsReported developments include deep learning-based models for mucosal abnormality detection, lymph-node characterization during EBUS-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA), improved lesion localization, and reduction in operator-dependent variability. Additionally, AI-assisted simulation platforms and decision-support tools are reshaping training paradigms. Nevertheless, most studies remain retrospective or single-center, with limited external validation, dataset heterogeneity, unclear model explainability, and incomplete integration into clinical workflows.
conclusionsAI has the potential to support lesion detection, navigation, and training in pulmonary endoscopy. However, robust prospective validation, standardized datasets, transparent model reporting, robust data governance, multidisciplinary collaboration, and careful integration into clinical practice are required before widespread adoption.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.