ArticleJournal of imaging2026
A TV-BM3D Iterative Algorithm for VMAT-CT Reconstruction.
Article in Journal of imaging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Volumetric modulated arc therapy-computed tomography (VMAT-CT), which is the CT reconstructed using the portal images collected during VMAT, can potentially be an effective onsite imaging tool. The goal of this study was to propose an iterative reconstruction algorithm that can further improve the image quality of VMAT-CT and reduce the number of failed reconstructions. An iterative algorithm combining total variation (TV) with block-matching and 3D filtering (BM3D) was proposed, addressing the L1-L2 regularization problem using the split Bregman method. We collected portal images from 67 VMAT cases including 50 phantom and 17 real-patient cases. Both Feldkamp-Davis-Kress (FDK) and TV-BM3D iterative algorithms were used to reconstruct VMAT-CT using the collected images. The preprocessing methods developed by our group previously were also used in this study. A total of 48 out of 50 phantom cases and 15 out of 17 real-patient cases were successfully reconstructed using the iterative algorithm together with image preprocessing. In contrast, 39 phantom cases and 8 patient cases could be reconstructed using the original FDK algorithm, and 44 phantom cases and 11 patient cases could be reconstructed using the FDK algorithm together with preprocessing. Compared with the FDK algorithm, the TV-BM3D iterative algorithm significantly improved the image quality of VMAT-CT at all treatment sites. To the best of our knowledge, this study is the first to develop an iterative VMAT-CT reconstruction algorithm. It can be used to reconstruct CT images locally, and is superior to FDK-based algorithms in terms of the success rate and reconstructed image quality. This strongly supports the use of VMAT-CT as a promising imaging tool for treatment monitoring and adaptive radiotherapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.