ArticleJournal of imaging2026
A Robust Rule-Based Framework for Stone Detection and Posterior Acoustic Shadow Localization in Abdominal Ultrasound.
Article in Journal of imaging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Posterior acoustic shadowing is a fundamental physical phenomenon associated with calcified stones in ultrasound image, yet it has not been fully exploited in automated ultrasound analysis. This study aimed to develop an explainable, semi-automatic rule-based framework that explicitly incorporates posterior acoustic shadow characteristics for stone detection and localization in a clinically guided manner. A rule-based framework was designed to generate stone candidates using morphological enhancement and to evaluate them through local contrast analysis, posterior shadow region assessment, and shape-based penalties. A composite score integrating these features was used to rank candidates. The method was evaluated on 52 kidney stone and 66 gallbladder stone ultrasound images, stratified into three diagnostic confidence categories. Performance was assessed using an ablation study and centroid distance error measured in pixels relative to expert-defined references. In the 50-60% confidence group, the accuracy increased from 0.29 to 0.64 for kidney stones and from 0.30 to 0.60 for gallbladder stones when posterior shadow information was included. Centroid distance errors in the ≥80% confidence group were 1.26 ± 0.28 mm for kidney stones and 1.44 ± 0.91 mm for gallbladder stones. The proposed framework enhances diagnostic confidence by leveraging physically grounded posterior acoustic shadow analysis and provides a reproducible augmentation to conventional ultrasound-based stone assessment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.