Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42042504›Full record

ArticleJournal of imaging2026

Comparative Assessment of Hyperspectral Image Segmentation Algorithms for Fruit Defect Detection Under Different Illumination Conditions.

Anastasia Zolotukhina, Anton Sudarev, Georgiy Nesterov, Demid Khokhlov

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of imaging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Anastasia ZolotukhinaScientific and Technological Centre of Unique Instrumentation of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 15 Butlerova, 117342 Moscow, Russia.ORCID 0000-0003-1043-7014
Anton SudarevScientific and Technological Centre of Unique Instrumentation of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 15 Butlerova, 117342 Moscow, Russia.
Georgiy NesterovScientific and Technological Centre of Unique Instrumentation of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 15 Butlerova, 117342 Moscow, Russia.ORCID 0009-0000-8647-6170
Demid KhokhlovScientific and Technological Centre of Unique Instrumentation of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 15 Butlerova, 117342 Moscow, Russia.ORCID 0000-0003-0919-7762

Funding

Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation FFNS-2024-0002
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study presents a comparative analysis of hyperspectral image segmentation algorithms for fruit defect detection under different illumination conditions. The research evaluates the performance of four segmentation methods (Spectral Angle Mapper, Random Forest, Support Vector Machine, and Neural Network) using three distinct illumination modes (local, simultaneous and sequential). The experimental setup employed hyperspectral imaging to assess tomato fruit samples, with data acquisition performed across the 450-850 nm spectral range. Quantitative metrics, including accuracy, error rate, precision, recall, F1-score, and Intersection over Union (IoU), were used to evaluate algorithm performance. Key findings indicate that Random Forest demonstrated superior performance across most metrics, particularly under simultaneous illumination conditions. The highest accuracy was achieved by Random Forest under sequential illumination (0.9971), while the best combination of segmentation metrics was obtained under simultaneous illumination, with an F1-score of 0.8996 and an IoU of 0.8176. The Neural Network showed competitive results. The Spectral Angle Mapper proved sensitive to illumination variations but excelled in specific scenarios requiring minimal memory usage. By demonstrating that acquisition protocol optimization can substantially improve segmentation performance, our results support the development of accurate, non-contact, high-throughput inspection systems and contribute to reducing postharvest losses and improving supply chain quality control.

Indexed as

diffuse reflectancefruit defect detectionilluminationimage segmentationmachine learningspectral imaging

Identifiers

PMID42042504
PMCPMC13118074

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.