Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42042502›Full record

ArticleJournal of imaging2026

Experimental Analysis of the Effects of Image Lightness and Chroma Modulation on the Reproduction of Glossiness, Transparency and Roughness.

Hideyuki Ajiki, Midori Tanaka

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of imaging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Hideyuki AjikiGraduate School of Science and Engineering, Chiba University, Yayoi-cho 1-33, Inage-ku, Chiba 263-8522, Japan.
Midori TanakaGraduate School of Informatics, Chiba University, Yayoi-cho 1-33, Inage-ku, Chiba 263-8522, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-4651-4942

Funding

Japan Science and Technology Agency JPMJFR242TJapan Society for the Promotion of Science 25K03133
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Even when an object's color is accurately reproduced in a colorimetrically reproduced image (CRI), the perceived material appearance does not necessarily match that of the original object. This mismatch remains a challenge for faithfully reproducing real-world appearance in digital media. In this study, we investigated how lightness and chroma modulation affect the perception of glossiness, transparency, and roughness. These three attributes were quantitatively correlated with physical surface properties and image features through a direct comparison between objects and images. Observers selected the images that best matched the material appearance of the physical samples for each attribute. Image features derived from the gray-level co-occurrence matrix (GLCM) and surface roughness parameters were analyzed to compare the selected images with the CRI. In the lightness experiment, observers consistently selected images with higher lightness than the CRI, which was accompanied by increased complexity in the luminance distribution. In the chroma experiment, images with higher chroma were preferred; however, changes in GLCM features were negligible. Notably, stimuli with small local luminance differences at the CRI required larger shifts in image features to achieve perceptual matching. These findings indicate that modulating the luminance distribution is crucial for aligning the perceived appearance between physical objects and their digital representations.

Indexed as

appearanceglossinessimage reproductionroughnesstransparency

Identifiers

PMID42042502
PMCPMC13118215

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.