ArticleJournal of imaging2026
Radon-Guided Wavelet-Domain Attention U-Net for Periodic Artifact Suppression in Brain MRI.
Article in Journal of imaging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Periodic artifacts such as ringing (Gibbs), herringbone (spike/corduroy), and zipper patterns degrade the quality of brain MRI. We present a reproducible framework that (i) synthetically generates periodic artifacts with controllable severity directly in k-space, (ii) normalizes pattern orientation through a Radon-guided alignment step, and (iii) corrects them in the wavelet domain using a 2D DWT (AA/AD/DA/DD) with a band-weighted loss. The evaluation was conducted using DLBS T1-weighted 3T MRI volumes with synthetically generated periodic artifacts. It combined global image-quality metrics (SSIM, PSNR) with per-band metrics to quantify how correction concentrates on high-frequency components, and included ablation studies, mixed-artifact stress tests, and structural preservation analyses. Compared with several baseline architectures, the proposed approach shows improvements in structural fidelity and a reduction in periodic patterns (SSIM: 0.985±0.022; PSNR: 43.337±5.364; reduction in concentrated error in high-frequency bands), while preserving unaffected structures. These findings indicate that, within a controlled synthetic benchmark, aligning the pattern orientation prior to learning and optimizing correction in the wavelet domain enables suppression of synthetically generated periodic artifacts while limiting over-smoothing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.